← Reading

Why Lunch Is Getting So Expensive

CET-4

'Even with a 20,000-yuan salary, I cannot afford fast food!' A hot topic about lunch prices makes people think about daily costs.

语速点单词查词 · 点 ▶ 听句子

A man earning 20,000 yuan a month recently made a complaint that went viral: “I cannot even afford a fast-food lunch anymore!” His words surprised many people — after all, 20,000 yuan is a good salary in China. But when he did the math, the picture looked different.

After tax and social insurance, his take-home pay is about 15,000 to 17,000 yuan. After rent and commuting, there is much less left. And in Shanghai, a simple lunch — one meat dish, one vegetable, one soup — now costs about 42 yuan. If you eat out twice a day, your monthly food bill can reach 1,800 yuan. That is nearly one third of his disposable income.

So what is happening? First, costs are rising: rent for restaurants, wages for cooks, and prices of vegetables have all gone up. Second, people’s tastes have changed — they want clean, fresh food, which costs more. Third, the problem is not really the lunch price alone; it is that many things have gotten more expensive at the same time, while salaries have not kept up.

Some people argue: if lunch is too expensive, cook at home. It is true that cooking saves money. But not everyone has time — city workers often leave home at 7 a.m. and return at 8 p.m. For them, cooking every day is not a choice but a burden.

The real lesson is about balance. Prices will not go down overnight, and no single person can change the economy. But we can all learn to spend smarter: compare prices, choose shops that fit our budget, and plan our meals. Small habits can soften big pressures. And for society, the question remains: how do we make sure that daily life stays affordable for ordinary people?

Words to know: salary (薪水), afford (负担得起), complaint (抱怨), rent (租金), income (收入), budget (预算), affordable (负担得起的), habit (习惯).

长难句拆解 · 形式主语与 while 对比

① It is true that cooking saves money. 主干是 cooking saves money(做饭省钱)。句首 It 是形式主语,真正的主语是 that 从句,It is true that… 就等于「……是真的」。这种句式常用来先让步、再转折,本文下句紧跟 But not everyone has time,正是「先承认、再反驳」的写法。动名词 cooking 作从句主语,谓语用单数 saves,也是常见考点。

② The problem is not really the lunch price alone; it is that many things have gotten more expensive at the same time, while salaries have not kept up. 分号连接两个对称分句,后半句主干是 it is that…,that 引导表语从句说明问题的实质。句尾 while 不表「当……时」而表对比,译作「而……却……」:一边是物价齐涨,一边是工资没跟上。这种对比用法是阅读对比题的高频信号。

同义替换 · 雅思阅读利器

题目从不照抄原文,全靠同义替换改写。做题时先在题干里圈出「信号词」,再回原文找它们的同义变体,定位速度会明显变快。本文可迁移的替换组:

  • make a complaint → voice a grievance / express dissatisfaction(抱怨类话题通用)
  • take-home pay → net income / after-tax earnings
  • have gone up → have risen / have climbed
  • have not kept up → have lagged behind / failed to catch up
  • costs are rising → prices are on the rise
  • go down overnight → fall in the short term
  • spend smarter → manage money more wisely
阅读自测 · 3 题
  1. 判断(T / F / NG) — The man’s monthly food bill can reach nearly one third of his disposable income.
  2. 简答(不超过 6 个词) — How much does a simple lunch cost in Shanghai now?
  3. 判断(T / F / NG) — The writer believes prices will go down overnight.
参考答案与解析
  1. T — 原文直接给出「your monthly food bill can reach 1,800 yuan. That is nearly one third of his disposable income」,两句话拼起来刚好对应题干,属数字对应类直述题。
  2. About 42 yuan. — 用 a simple lunch 定位到「a simple lunch — one meat dish, one vegetable, one soup — now costs about 42 yuan」,破折号间的插入语是干扰,核心信息在 costs about 之后。
  3. F — 原文落点是「Prices will not go down overnight」,明确说价格不会一夜回落,题干悄悄删掉了 not,属「反向偷换」式干扰项。
中文译文

一名月薪两万元的男子最近发了一句引爆网络的不满之言:「我现在连一顿快餐午餐都吃不起了!」他的话让许多人意外——毕竟,两万元在中国算是不错的薪水。但当他算了一笔账,情况就不一样了。

扣掉税和社保后,他的到手工资约为一万五千到一万七千元。再减去房租和通勤,剩下的就不多了。而在上海,一顿简单的午餐——一荤一素一汤——如今要花大约 42 元。如果每天在外吃两顿,每月伙食费能达到 1800 元,差不多占他可支配收入的近三分之一。

那么到底发生了什么?首先,成本在上涨:餐厅租金、厨师工资、蔬菜价格全都涨了。其次,人们的口味变了——他们要干净、新鲜的食材,这更花钱。第三,问题其实不只是午餐价格本身;而是「许多东西」同时变贵,而工资却没有跟上。

有人会说:午餐太贵,那就自己在家做。自己做饭确实省钱,这没错。但并非人人都有时间——城市上班族往往早上七点出门、晚上八点才回家。对他们来说,天天做饭不是一种选择,而是负担。

真正的启示在于平衡。物价不会一夜回落,也没有哪个人能改变经济。但我们都可以学着更聪明地花钱:比价、选择符合预算的店铺、规划好三餐。小小的习惯能缓解巨大的压力。而对整个社会来说,问题依然存在:我们该如何确保普通人的日常生活依然「负担得起」?